It is valid if the schema processor is performing lax validation, or if it
can locate (by some magic) a definition of the <doc> element.

Whether the processor is performing lax validation, and the mechanisms it
uses to locate schema components, are properties of your processor/API, not
something that's defined by the schema spec itself.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xmlschema-dev-request@w... 
> [mailto:xmlschema-dev-request@w...] On Behalf Of Bryan Rasmussen
> Sent: 04 April 2005 11:56
> To: 'xmlschema-dev@w...'
> Subject: SV: rules for handling document elements not in the 
> target namesp ace?
> 
> 
> I guess my earlier email must not have been clear, or at 
> least I hope it was
> lack of clarity and not just a question so stupid as to be 
> unanswerable
> without emotional pain, so here is a second attempt:
> 
> given the following schema:
> 
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <schema 
> targetNamespace="http://rep.oio.dk/xkom.dk/xml/schemas/2004/02/02/"
> xmlns:xkom="http://rep.oio.dk/xkom.dk/xml/schemas/2004/02/02/"
> xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" 
> elementFormDefault="qualified"
> attributeFormDefault="unqualified">
> 	<element name="EmailAddressIdentifier"
> type="xkom:EmailAddressIdentifierType">
> 		<annotation>
> 			<documentation
> source="http://rep.oio.dk/xkom.dk/xml/schemas/2004/02/02/xkom_
> emailaddressid
> entifier.xsd.meta.xml"/>
> 		</annotation>
> 	</element>
> 	<simpleType name="EmailAddressIdentifierType">
> 		<restriction base="token">
> 			<pattern
> value="([^&gt;\(\)\[\]\\,;:@\s]{1,90}@[^&gt;@]{1,64})"/>
> </restriction>
> 	</simpleType>
> </schema>
> 
> and the following instance
> 
> <doc xmlns:xkom="http://rep.oio.dk/xkom.dk/xml/schemas/2004/02/02/"
> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
> xsi:schemaLocation="http://rep.oio.dk/xkom.dk/xml/schemas/2004/02/02/
> email.xsd" 
> >
> <xkom:EmailAddressIdentifier>bry@i...</xkom:EmailAddress
> Identifier>
> <xkom:EmailAddressIdentifier>bry@i...</xkom:EmailAddress
> Identifier>
> <xkom:EmailAddressIdentifier>bry@i...</xkom:EmailAddress
> Identifier>
> <xkom:EmailAddressIdentifier>bry@i...</xkom:EmailAddress
> Identifier>
> 
> </doc>
> 
> is that instance valid?
> 
> I thought it should be, according to XSV and msxml's 
> SchemaCache it is okay,
> XSV in this case defaults to a lax processing, a coworker 
> says he remembers
> this being optional according to the spec. Can anybody 
> reference me to the
> part where this is defined as optional, or if not where it is 
> explicitly
> allowed or disallowed?
> 
> 
> 
> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> Fra: Bryan Rasmussen 
> Sendt: 31. marts 2005 16:00
> Til: 'xmlschema-dev@w...'
> Emne: rules for handling document elements not in the target 
> namespace?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi, I have a schema in namespace X that validates one global 
> element, in
> order to test that element I went ahead and put various 
> versions of the
> element in a document with a document element in a different 
> namespace, most
> processors reacted fine with that and told me that my proper 
> examples were
> correct and my bad examples were incorrect. 
> XMLSPY however got upset that the document element was not 
> validated in my
> schema.
> 
> as a second test I then created an instance consisting only 
> of a document
> element not in the target namespace of the schema which 
> XMLSPY also reported
> as being invalid because of the document element not being 
> validated by the
> schema. 
> 
> A co-worker said that this was because doing so was optional 
> by the spec, by
> my memory this was not one of the optional sections. I've 
> looked but of
> course the spec is rather large, can someone point me to the 
> optional part
> of the spec on this matter or give me some backup on its not 
> being optional
> if indeed it isn't. 
> 
> 



From David.Hirtle@n... Mon Apr 04 14:44:41 2005
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41])
	by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.44)
	id 1DISoj-0002kP-6