Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives


Re: UPA violation or not?

From: noah_mendelsohn@--.---.---
To: Morris Matsa <mmatsa@--.---.--->
Date: 12/16/2004 3:50:00 AM
I'm a little confused about this question.  Not only does it look like a 
UPA violation, it looks a little bit like the simple examples of UPA 
violations that are used to introduce the topic.  In DTD terms, this is 
like (pongo?, pongo?),  except that since we have counting it's (pongo[0-2], pongo[0-2]). 

A single pongo matches either the first or the second particle.  The 
attribution to particles is thus ambiguous for at least one instance. QED.

Is there a subtlety in the example that I am missing?  It's true that the 
two particles have the same value for {term}, but that doesn't make them 
the same particle.  Apologies if I'm missing something obvious.

--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn 
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------





From paul.downey@b... Thu Dec 16 14:47:31 2004
Received: fro


transparent
Print
Mail
Like It
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent