Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >xmlschema-dev Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - UPA violation or not? >Thread Next - Handling the enumeration facet Re: UPA violation or not?To: Morris Matsa <mmatsa@--.---.---> Date: 12/16/2004 3:50:00 AM I'm a little confused about this question. Not only does it look like a UPA violation, it looks a little bit like the simple examples of UPA violations that are used to introduce the topic. In DTD terms, this is like (pongo?, pongo?), except that since we have counting it's (pongo[0-2], pongo[0-2]). A single pongo matches either the first or the second particle. The attribution to particles is thus ambiguous for at least one instance. QED. Is there a subtlety in the example that I am missing? It's true that the two particles have the same value for {term}, but that doesn't make them the same particle. Apologies if I'm missing something obvious. -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 -------------------------------------- From paul.downey@b... Thu Dec 16 14:47:31 2004 Received: fro | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
