"Michael Kay" <mike@s...> writes:

>> Does this mean as well, that if a schema document (A) with an
>> existing target namespace includes a schema document (B) with no
>> target namespace, which, in turn, includes a schema document (C),
>> the target namespace of (B) will still be 'absent' when the
>> constraints for including of (C) are applied? IOW, does this
>> chameleon-effect touch the first level of includes only?
>> 
>
> My reading is that the components derived from C are copied into the schema
> corresponding to B with no change in namespace, but when the components are
> then copied into A, the namespace is changed regardless whether they
> originated from B or C.

That's my reading also.

ht
-- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@i...
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]

From k.buchcik@4... Wed Oct 06 10:18:13 2004
Received: f