Altova Mailing List Archives
xml-dev
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/1/2012 2:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/1/2012 5:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/1/2012 3:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/1/2012 4:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/1/2012 4:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/1/2012 7:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/1/2012 4:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/1/2012 4:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/1/2012 5:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/1/2012 5:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/1/2012 9:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/2/2012 2:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/1/2012 5:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/1/2012 6:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/1/2012 3:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/1/2012 9:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/1/2012 9:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/4/2012 10:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Creating Context-Dependent Data Models - 2/1/2012 3:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/1/2012 4:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/2/2012 3:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/2/2012 3:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/2/2012 10:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/2/2012 11:25:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/3/2012 12:09:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/3/2012 12:15:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/3/2012 2:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/3/2012 12:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/3/2012 10:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/3/2012 11:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/3/2012 11:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/4/2012 2:43:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/4/2012 3:12:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/3/2012 12:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/4/2012 9:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/5/2012 4:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/2/2012 10:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/3/2012 9:42:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/3/2012 10:00:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/3/2012 3:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/3/2012 10:14:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/3/2012 3:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/3/2012 6:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/3/2012 2:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/3/2012 3:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/3/2012 10:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/3/2012 11:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/1/2012 6:56:00 PM
[xml-dev] How to be nimble, agile in the face of changing - 2/1/2012 7:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to be nimble, agile in the face of changing - 2/1/2012 8:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to be nimble, agile in the face of changing - 2/1/2012 8:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to be nimble, agile in the face of changing - 2/1/2012 9:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to be nimble, agile in the face of changing - 2/1/2012 10:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to be nimble, agile in the face of changing - 2/1/2012 10:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to be nimble, agile in the face of changing - 2/2/2012 12:23:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] How to be nimble, agile in the face of changing - 2/2/2012 9:32:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] How to be nimble, agile in the face of changing - 2/2/2012 2:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to be nimble, agile in the face of changing - 2/1/2012 9:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to be nimble, agile in the face of changing - 2/2/2012 4:15:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] How to be nimble, agile in the face of changing - 2/2/2012 5:02:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] How to be nimble, agile in the face of changing - 2/2/2012 8:07:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] book for beginners - 2/2/2012 3:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/3/2012 11:09:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/3/2012 4:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/4/2012 9:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Naming conventions for a sampling of W3C and ISO XML - 2/3/2012 6:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Naming conventions for a sampling of W3C and ISO XML - 2/3/2012 7:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Naming conventions for a sampling of W3C and ISO XML - 2/3/2012 8:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Naming conventions for a sampling of W3C and ISO XML - 2/4/2012 1:22:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Naming conventions for a sampling of W3C and ISO XML - 2/4/2012 10:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/3/2012 5:21:00 PM
[xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an existing - 2/3/2012 7:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/4/2012 2:13:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/4/2012 2:49:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/4/2012 12:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/4/2012 6:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/4/2012 8:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/4/2012 8:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/4/2012 9:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/4/2012 10:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/6/2012 5:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/4/2012 8:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/4/2012 9:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/5/2012 5:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/5/2012 5:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/5/2012 7:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/5/2012 8:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/6/2012 2:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/6/2012 3:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/6/2012 5:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/6/2012 6:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/6/2012 6:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/6/2012 9:42:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/4/2012 10:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/4/2012 10:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/4/2012 11:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/4/2012 11:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/6/2012 4:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/6/2012 4:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/6/2012 4:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/6/2012 5:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/6/2012 6:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/6/2012 11:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/6/2012 6:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/6/2012 9:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/6/2012 9:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/6/2012 9:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/6/2012 10:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/6/2012 10:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/6/2012 11:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/6/2012 10:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/7/2012 1:13:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/6/2012 11:59:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/7/2012 12:18:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/7/2012 12:40:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/10/2012 5:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/7/2012 2:25:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/7/2012 2:47:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/7/2012 2:50:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/4/2012 3:04:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of - 2/4/2012 12:20:00 AM
[xml-dev] XML data sets with (known) data quality problems - 2/6/2012 1:47:00 PM
[xml-dev] PCDATA element type and CDATA attribute type - 2/6/2012 3:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] PCDATA element type and CDATA attribute type - 2/6/2012 4:09:00 PM
[xml-dev] [ANN] BaseX 7.1: The XMLPrague 2012 Edition - 2/7/2012 11:47:00 PM
[xml-dev] Boolean attributes in XHTML/HTML5 - 2/10/2012 10:30:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Boolean attributes in XHTML/HTML5 - 2/10/2012 2:06:00 PM
[xml-dev] What is "syntactic identity"? What is "surface syntax"? - 2/12/2012 11:37:00 AM
[xml-dev] functional databases noodling ... - 2/14/2012 9:01:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] functional databases noodling ... - 2/15/2012 5:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] functional databases noodling ... - 2/15/2012 6:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] functional databases noodling ... - 2/15/2012 7:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] functional databases noodling ... - 2/15/2012 8:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] functional databases noodling ... - 2/16/2012 12:12:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] functional databases noodling ... - 2/20/2012 9:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] functional databases noodling ... - 2/21/2012 9:03:00 AM
[xml-dev] [ Conference ] What is Good XML? How Can We Tell? - 2/15/2012 6:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] [ Conference ] What is Good - 2/16/2012 5:45:00 AM
[xml-dev] CAMV validation framework v2.01 now available - 2/16/2012 5:55:00 AM
[xml-dev] New CAMeditor XML open source toolkit release 2.1.1 and - 2/16/2012 6:01:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Noob: XML validation capabilities beyond schemas - 2/16/2012 6:08:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Stability of schemas -- frequency of versioning - 2/16/2012 6:24:00 AM
[xml-dev] functional databases noodling ... - 2/16/2012 8:37:00 PM
[xml-dev] RE: What is "syntactic identity"? What is "surface syntax"? - 2/19/2012 7:34:00 PM
[xml-dev] RDF people, please define "surface syntax" and "concrete - 2/20/2012 12:53:00 PM
[xml-dev] Re: RDF people, please define "surface syntax" and - 2/20/2012 5:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an - 2/20/2012 7:28:00 PM
[xml-dev] [ANN] Qizx 4.4p1 is available - 2/22/2012 5:11:00 PM
[xml-dev] Formatting Processing Instructions - 2/22/2012 8:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Formatting Processing Instructions - 2/22/2012 9:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Formatting Processing Instructions - 2/22/2012 9:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Encoding charset of HTTP Basic Authentication - 2/23/2012 11:41:00 AM
[xml-dev] A tool that takes an XML document of points as input and - 2/23/2012 9:22:00 PM
[xml-dev] RE: A tool that takes an XML document of points as input - 2/23/2012 10:39:00 PM
[xml-dev] RE: A tool that takes an XML document of points as input - 2/23/2012 10:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A tool that takes an XML document of points as input - 2/23/2012 10:32:00 PM
[xml-dev] Side-by-side comparison of XML Schema and Relax NG - 2/24/2012 4:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Side-by-side comparison of XML Schema and Relax NG - 2/24/2012 6:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Side-by-side comparison of XML Schema and Relax NG - 2/25/2012 10:15:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Side-by-side comparison of XML Schema and Relax NG - 2/25/2012 10:44:00 AM
[xml-dev] When is an XML vocabulary too complex? The art and science - 2/25/2012 7:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] When is an XML vocabulary too complex? The art and - 2/25/2012 9:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] When is an XML vocabulary too - 2/26/2012 2:20:00 AM
[xml-dev] What does "optional" mean? - 2/26/2012 2:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What does "optional" mean? - 2/26/2012 4:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What does "optional" mean? - 2/26/2012 4:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What does "optional" mean? - 2/26/2012 5:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What does "optional" mean? - 2/26/2012 10:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What does "optional" mean? - 2/27/2012 12:40:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] What does "optional" mean? - 2/27/2012 3:37:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] What does "optional" mean? - 2/27/2012 8:39:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] What does "optional" mean? - 2/27/2012 4:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What does "optional" mean? - 2/27/2012 4:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What does "optional" mean? - 2/27/2012 6:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What does "optional" mean? - 2/26/2012 8:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What does "optional" mean? - 2/26/2012 10:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What does "optional" mean? - 2/26/2012 4:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What does "optional" mean? - 2/26/2012 10:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Correct xml:lang value for Pinyin Chinese vs Simplified - 2/27/2012 10:29:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] What does "optional" mean? - 2/27/2012 3:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What does "optional" mean? - 2/27/2012 6:21:00 PM
[xml-dev] XPath/XQuery/XSLT fn:node() question - 2/28/2012 6:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XQuery/XSLT fn:node() question - 2/28/2012 6:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XQuery/XSLT fn:node() question - 2/28/2012 7:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XQuery/XSLT fn:node() question - 2/28/2012 7:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XQuery/XSLT fn:node() question - 2/28/2012 8:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath/XQuery/XSLT fn:node() question - 2/28/2012 7:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath/XQuery/XSLT fn:node() question - 2/28/2012 7:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Boolean attributes in XHTML/HTML5 - 2/28/2012 10:21:00 PM
[xml-dev] Do attributes have scope? Are attributes metadata? - 2/29/2012 1:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Do attributes have scope? Are attributes metadata? - 2/29/2012 1:37:00 PM
[xml-dev] The edge of chaos: where syntax ends and interpretation - 2/29/2012 3:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The edge of chaos: where syntax ends and interpretation - 2/29/2012 4:21:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The edge of chaos: where syntax ends and interpretation - 2/29/2012 3:27:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The edge of chaos: where syntax ends and interpretation - 2/29/2012 3:42:00 PM
Disclaimer
These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

