Mukul Gandhi wrote:
> Since DTD is already mentioned in the XML spec, why not specify XSD as
> well as a normative reference to a future XML spec?  
Because XSD is complete crap that utterly betrayed the premises and 
goals of XML perhaps?
> I think, mentioning XSD in the XML spec will encourage users to use
> XSD as a better validation technology, than DTD. Mentioning this as a
> reference link in XML spec, looks like a very minor and non disruptive
> addition to me, for the XML spec
The way to use XSD as a better validation technology is to learn from 
it, rather than encourage it.

Cheers
Rick

_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php