Uche Ogbuji wrote:
> I read this, and I decided not to comment, because there is not much 
> nice to say.
> 
> Goddess knows XML has its problems but in effect this guys is saying "I 
> designed an XML app using XML in a very dumb way, and the app 
> disappointed me.  The fault must lie with XML".
> 
> Almost every point he touches on is one that I've spent a decade 
> advising clients to deal with successfully.

Fair enough, but this was in 2000 - when I think the XML hype was at its 
height.  I mostly pointed to it as lessons learned, though by some more 
than others!

I wouldn't say that the fault lies with XML - but I'd happily say that 
the fault lies with common practices around XML, practices that I still 
hear regularly in conversations about how people would like to handle 
their data.

> Bottom line: use XML where it's best suited, and employ good XML and 
> systems design.  I know.  Obvious, right?  :)

In 2009, to people who know a fair amount about XML - yes.  To the rest 
of the world - I'm not so sure!

Thanks,
-- 
Simon St.Laurent
http://simonstl.com/

_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php