Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives


Re: [xml-dev] My proposal: Implicit namespaces

From: Michael Ludwig <milu71@---.-->
To: 'XML Developers List' <xml-dev@-----.---.--->
Date: 8/6/2009 8:42:00 PM
Liam Quin schrieb am 06.08.2009 um 11:11:09 (-0400):
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 03:16:58PM +0100, Dave Pawson wrote:
> > On 08/06/2009 10:21 AM, Michael Kay wrote:
> [...]
> >> Another way to achieve this goal is to allow the designer of an XML
> >> vocabulary (=a set of namespaces) to define
> >> 
> > >(a) a list of predeclared namespace prefixes for that vocabulary
> >> (b) a list of local names that are known to be in each of those
> >>     namespaces

"Predeclared" and "known". The parsing context (or whatever you would
call that) can be statically established. No prefix scoping to deal
with.

> >> When invoking an XML parser, the user should be able to reference
> >> this "vocabulary definition",
> [...]
> 
> >> An "nnML parser" is then an XML parser with built-in knowledge of
> >> the nnML vocabulary definition.
> 
> This is very close to the proposal I've made...

I might be wrong, but I'm not sure it is. Reasons below.

> > So for docbook you'd have an author include all 300+ namespaced
> > elements ?
> 
> You only need to list those elements that can occur embedded in
> another vocabulary, plus the top-level element.  For example, a list
> item might not make sense without a containing list.

But then again, it might:

<xsl:template match="Liste">
  <list><xsl:apply-templates select="Artikel"/></list>
</xsl:apply-templates>

<xsl:template match="Artikel">
  <item><xsl:apply-templates/></item>
</xsl:apply-templates>

This particular example doesn't matter much, but with XSLT used to
generate XML, it is questionable to preclude any element from appearing
embedded in another vocabulary.

> So, a docbook list would automatically introduce the docbook namespace
> for all the elements it contained (until you got down to ones that
> implied some other namespace, such as "svg" perhaps).

Voilà the concept of scope reintroduced, isn't it? It's just that
now the current namespace is not signalled by a prefix attached to
a declaration, but by the last namespace-scope-setting element.

In streaming mode, you wouldn't know what namespace you're in unless you
swim back up the river to find a namespace-scope-setting ancestor.

-- 
Michael Ludwig

_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php



transparent
Print
Mail
Like It
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent