Original Message From: "Liam Quin"

> Donkeys can't type very fast... I can see there there might be pushback
> for this proposal on the grounds that it's considerably more verbose
> than most other current proposals, with the exception of the {...}
> syntax...

See my proposal from yesterday that allowed partial namespaces 
(http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200908/msg00033.html ).

> also, it can't easily be made compatible with
> things like ch.cern.html (later org.ietf.html, and then org.w3.html,
> of course, and also ch.iso.html...)

If you make the namespace more obviously separable from the local name, (for 
example, by using a : rather than another .), then the XML parser can be 
informed as a local implementation that namespace org.ietf.html is an alias 
of namespace org.w3.html (or better still, namespace html.ietf.org is an 
alias of namespace html.w3.org).  So when the parser encounters 
<body:html.ietf.org> it can return the equivalent of <body:html.w3.org>.

Pete Cordell
Codalogic Ltd
Interface XML to C++ the easy way using XML C++
data binding to convert XSD schemas to C++ classes.
Visit http://codalogic.com/lmx/ or http://www.xml2cpp.com
for more info



_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php