On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Michael Kay<mike@s...> wrote:
>> The implementation of Higher Order Functions (HOF) in XSLT (1.0 or
>> 2.0) would not have been possible if the namespace mechanism
>> was not available.
>
> I think you mean "some kind of namespace mechanism". The current namespace
> mechanism is probably better than having none at all, but it still has many
> serious problems.

Yes, the HOF implementation uses namespaces as it would use any
available GUID mechanism.


-- 
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
-------------------------------------
Never fight an inanimate object
-------------------------------------
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play

_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php