On 7/7/09 16:40, Jonathan Robie wrote:
> Dan Brickley wrote:
>> You write "Typically, Working Groups are rechartered if there is
>> active interest in their work and they are close to their goal, as the
>> XHTML Working Group is. Another year of effort would probably be
>> sufficient to finish the XHTML specifications."
>>
>> Although not as high-profile as a REC-track group, there is nothing to
>> stop a group of like-minded W3C members single-handedly chartering an
>> Incubator Group (XG, see http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ ) to try to
>> progress the XHTML efforts. Perhaps - in part - by defining a recovery
>> model for ill-formed XML markup?
>
> But it looks like XHTML5 is slated to replace it.
 >
> Can we count on XHTML5 to meet all the requirements of XHTML?

What are they?

http://www.google.com/search?q=xhtml+requirements finds a few things but 
nothing obviously up-to-date and appropriate...

cheers,

Dan





_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php