Dan Brickley wrote:
> You write "Typically, Working Groups are rechartered if there is 
> active interest in their work and they are close to their goal, as the 
> XHTML Working Group is. Another year of effort would probably be 
> sufficient to finish the XHTML specifications."
>
> Although not as high-profile as a REC-track group, there is nothing to 
> stop a group of like-minded W3C members single-handedly chartering an 
> Incubator Group (XG, see http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ ) to try to 
> progress the XHTML efforts. Perhaps - in part - by defining a recovery 
> model for ill-formed XML markup?

But it looks like XHTML5 is slated to replace it.

Can we count on XHTML5 to meet all the requirements of XHTML?

Jonathan

_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php