Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives


Re: [xml-dev] Canonical set of rules for systems?

From: Ken Starks <ken@---------.-----.--.-->
To: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@-----.--->
Date: 5/8/2009 6:48:00 AM
Hi,

Yes please, CSML sounds like a really good idea to me.

Ken.

----

Costello, Roger L. wrote:
 
Excellent! Thanks Ken.

You are saying that one thing needed by systems is a set of rules for customer satisfaction. These rules are derived from taking measurements on the system. Perhaps we need a Customer Satisfaction Markup Language (CSML)?

/Roger

Ken Starks wrote (by mistake sent first by email to Roger only):

-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Starks [mailto:ken@l...] 
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 11:45 AM
To: Costello, Roger L.
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Canonical set of rules for systems?

The main thing that is missing, to my way of thinking, is some sort of 
overall quality metric for user-friendliness.
Informally stated, "Do the  users come away from a session on the system 
feeling happy?"
i.e.   How shall we know - in six months time - that the system as a 
whole is working nicely ?  that its
users enjoy using it ?  

For a web-based system, this can to a certain extent be measured by 
recording mouse-clicks that
reveal false trails or early quitting by the users; or that measure how 
they return to the site; or social-networking
recommendations, etc.
For other systems you might need to build-in some sort of feedback form, 
trouble-ticket system, help line or
whatever, and take data from that for statistical analysis.

I am sure we have all used systems that work according to the designers' 
sets of rules, but leave you
feeling ... well ... (Grr) .. angry. Last week, for example, I bought a 
train ticket online, and the system
insisted on making me jump through a zillion hoops, and asked me a 
zillion completely irrelevant
questions. And it made me go right back to the beginning when I decided 
to take a single ticket rather
than a return  ( ... Grr, Grr ! ).

Please make sure your canonical set of rules discourage that ! To do so 
would certainly be part of
my design brief if I asked you to design a system for me.

Yours sincerely,
Ken.



Costello, Roger L. wrote:

> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > When designing a system make explicit the rules of the system. These rules include:
> >
> > - rules that define the system's process/workflow
> >
> > - rules that define the data validity of documents routed through the system
> >
> > - rules that define the system's user interface
> >
> > - rules that define the relationship/taxonomy of the system's data
> >
> >
> > What other rules are there in systems?
> >
> > Is there a canonical set of rules?
> >
> >
> > Here's a start at a canonical set of rules for systems:
> >
> > 1. Process/workflow rules
> >
> > 2. Data validity rules
> >
> > 3. User interface rules
> >
> > 4. Data relationship rules
> >
> > What else?
> >
> > /Roger
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> >
> > XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> > to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> > spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
> >
> > [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> > Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
> > subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
> > List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> > List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
> >
> >
> >
> >   
>   




Costello, Roger L. wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> When designing a system make explicit the rules of the system. These rules include:
>
> - rules that define the system's process/workflow
>
> - rules that define the data validity of documents routed through the system
>
> - rules that define the system's user interface
>
> - rules that define the relationship/taxonomy of the system's data
>
>
> What other rules are there in systems?
>
> Is there a canonical set of rules?
>
>
> Here's a start at a canonical set of rules for systems:
>
> 1. Process/workflow rules
>
> 2. Data validity rules
>
> 3. User interface rules
>
> 4. Data relationship rules
>
> What else?
>
> /Roger
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
> subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>
>
>
>   


_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php



transparent
Print
Mail
Like It
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent