Paul Spencer wrote:
>> -----Original Message----- From: Chuck Bearden [mailto:cbearden@r...]
>>  Sent: 22 April 2009 23:17 To: Pete Cordell Cc: Andrew Welch; xml-dev 
>> Subject: Re: [xml-dev]Changing Namespaces Between Specification Versions
>> 
> <snip>
>> The decision was made (a) to add a version attribute to the root element,
>> and (b) not to change the namespace URI (which was already unversioned). 
>> Did the maintainers of EgXML make the right choice?
> 
> I used to like adding version numbers to root elements, but I find that
> more and more of my work involves content from multiple namespaces. Then
 > this no longer really works unless you start to complicate things.

Are multiple namespaces a problem in this connection if it is understood that 
a particular version of the language of the context instance always makes use 
of particular versions of the other included languages?

Chuck
-- 
Chuck Bearden (cbearden@r... ; 713.348.3661)
http://cnx.org/

_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php