Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >xml-dev Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - [xml-dev] Syntax versus Semantics (was: "vocabulary constraints" and >Thread Next - RE: [xml-dev] Syntax versus Semantics (was: "vocabulary constraints" RE: [xml-dev] Syntax versus Semantics (was: "vocabulary constraints"To: "'Costello, Roger L.'" <costello@-----.--->, <xml-dev@-----.---.---> Date: 3/1/2009 7:16:00 PM The question at the heart of it is meaningfulness which some attribute to intention expressed as a control over a value. The web as a unidirectional link expresses that easily. It is the effect of multiple intentions expressed as controls over a value that it doesn't express well. If intentions have effects, are affects meaningful or meaning? What a computer expresses or can express is as Turing said, a paper tape, a sample or input. a piano roll. When multiple users of computers express it, it is something more than a sequencer. It is interactive. Feedback from multiple interactions change related values or the same values. Is feedback coupling strength a measure of meaning? Or are all of these merely models. IOW, we can describe the system, but the meaningfulness or meaning of that remains independent or outside it as human thought. Does a computer have intent? No. But for all practical purposes, that doesn't matter. Example: receive an invoice for items thought paid. Find out T&Cs were correct in the human memory, but the computer wasn't informed. Computer automatically sends invoices initiating further invoices and other instructions. SNAFU. Whatever, it is a socially expensive event. It has meaning: rude. So far though, on the web, AI is still expressed as links among datasets. Sampling or programming. The basic problem is still the social contract for the use of the beasties. A computer is still for most intents, a better telephone except this time party lines are encouraged instead of routed directly. We get back some fun our parent's parents had with Bell. A recent article in Scientific American discusses the problem of non-locale in physics, that entanglement introduces non-locality as an effect and we have no semantic model for what that means. We don't know what that means as a higher order organizing force. Dark matter? God? No one knows. Pause to wonder. len _______________________________________________________________________ XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS to support XML implementation and development. To minimize spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting. [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/ Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l... subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l... List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
