On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Cox, Bruce <Bruce.Cox@u...> wrote:
> I won't comment on the success or failure of RDF, but it seems to me
> that it's highly abstract, not necessarily highly generic.

Ok, I'll bite.  What's the difference?  (Seriously...)

> What is a generic vocabulary?  One that serves too many masters?  Poorly
> focused?  Become confused in the minds of consumers as referring to a
> whole class of (vocabularies | schemas) rather than just the one?
>
> Bruce B Cox
-- 
Peter Hunsberger

_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php