Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives


RE: [xml-dev] Feasibility of "do all application coding in the XML

From: "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@-----------.--.-->
To: "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@-------.---.-->
Date: 12/3/2008 3:00:00 PM
Hi Rick,

> Yes. XML standards and tools took a gigantic step backwards 
> in that regard, and have never recovered or tried to take 
> that use case seriously. The explosion in new uses allows us 
> to treat that kind of use as niche or external, rather than intrinsic.

It would be good for the XSLT language, and perhaps others,
if a general mechanism for generating a parser was possible.  
I was at a loss to think what that mechanism might be, but I see 
you are describing one such approach taken by OmniMark.

>   3) Those who used OmniMark. This was people who could pay 
> for a tool.

I'm certainly not against paying for tools!  But to help XSLT 
gain traction it is necessary to make something generally useful 
available for free.  Maybe more free stuff will be available if 
the base of users gets bigger.

> 
> The thing about OmniMark was that it had a built-in text 
> processor, so that non-SGML files could be marked up to spec 
> on demand. 

> 
> Furthermore, the input processing, the parsing and the output 
> processing was implemented using co-routines, so it was 
> possible to process the input differently depending on the 
> currently generated element context.  
> This overcame a problem that affects systems based on piping 
> the output of a text-to-markup process into a 
> markup-transformation process, that for any kind of complex 
> input you may need to have grammar-dependent input 
> processing: In the case of OmniMark, the unminimized markup 
> could be used to guide processing both the input and the 
> output; in a pipeline solution you would need to specify the 
> grammar for the text-to-markup converter explicitly, which 
> could be double handling.

I like the idea!  Kind of like the text-to-spreadsheet wizards you
see, only any given (binary) thing to XML (well maybe SAX events).  

Cheers,
Peter Rushforth 


_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php



transparent
Print
Mail
Like It
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent