On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Robert Koberg <rob@k...> wrote:
>
> On Dec 2, 2008, at 8:20 AM, Christoph LANGE wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 02 December 2008 12:52:15 James Fuller wrote:
>>>
>>> u might want to take another look at xquery  ... I have found that
>>> most of the functional idioms are doable with extensions (1st class
>>> funcs) and XQuery lends itself readily to working with XML... u may
>>> even find you can port your code through time by directly using your
>>> existing xslt transforms from within XQuery as you figure out
>>> refactoring them.
>>
>> Thanks, sounds interesting!  Now that I only have basic knowledge about
>> XQuery, could you tell me
>>
>> * how to use XSL transformations from within XQuery
>
> very clumsily if you are using an XML DB, losing the advantage that you gain
> by the XML DB

w/o functional idioms then yes I agree, but once funcs are first class
then all that awkwardness goes away.

please expand ?

>> * where to find such functional extensions
>> ?
>
> You *get* to make/maintain different XQuery templates for each processor you
> want to try out/use.


I agree that we need the equiv of EXSLT for XQuery quick ...
functional sigs are all different everywhere and all this is just
vendor lockin in a new disguise.

> XQuery - the thinking man's PHP (but without PHP's standardization)

hehe, I never knew that php had standardisation (I assume u being
ironic??) and dont get me started on the probs associated with php
(all funcs in the same namespace is a start ...)

... as for xquery it was never intended to be used as a replacement
for php ... its an answer to sql

The relational data model is based on set theory and predicate logic.
Data is represented as n-ary relations and the use of relational
algebra is applicable. XQuery addresses the need of the xml data
model.

that being said XQuery is a useful language in its own right, just as
much as XSLT is.

Jim Fuller
> -Rob
>
>>
>>
>> Then, I'm not so sure whether XQuery is the right solution for my problem,
>> as
>> the processing order in which I do most of my XML->RDF extraction is a
>> depth-first recursive traversal of the input tree, i.e. what XSLT gives me
>> for
>> free.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Christoph
>>
>> --
>> Christoph Lange, Jacobs Univ. Bremen, http://kwarc.info/clange, Skype
>> duke4701
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
> subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>
>

_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php