Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >xml-dev Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - [xml-dev] Type substitution vs. element substitution (aka >Thread Next - RE: [xml-dev] Type substitution vs. element substitution (aka Re: [xml-dev] Type substitution vs. element substitution (akaTo: xml-dev@-----.---.--- Date: 11/25/2008 5:41:00 PM Farrukh Najmi wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > Is there a suggested best practice to choose between type substitution > and element substitution for XML schemas that wish to support > extension via inheritance? Please share your opinions and experience > as well as any resources on the subject. Thank you. > Here are some resources I have found: Against xsi:type: <http://blog.whatfettle.com/2006/11/29/xsitype-is-evil/> <http://norman.walsh.name/2004/01/29/trainwreck> Against element substitution: <http://www.kohsuke.org/xmlschema/XMLSchemaDOsAndDONTs.html> Neutral or leaning towards xsi:type: <http://www.xfront.com/VariableContentContainers.pdf> I am surprised that this question got only 1 response (thanks Boris). Can we please get some more input and experience sharing on this. Thanks. -- Regards, Farrukh Najmi Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com _______________________________________________________________________ XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS to support XML implementation and development. To minimize spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting. [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/ Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l... subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l... List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
