Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives


Re: [xml-dev] Is "XML" an abbreviation or an acronym?

From: "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@-----.--->
To: mike@--------.--.--
Date: 8/25/2008 12:55:00 PM
I rethought this concept, and below are the definitions again (with
definition of 'word' also) ...

abbreviation - a shortened or contracted form of a word or phrase,
used to represent the whole, as Dr. for Doctor, lb. for pound.

acronym - a word formed from the initial letters or groups of letters
of words in a set phrase or series of words, as OPEC from Organization
of Petroleum Exporting Countries, or loran from long-range navigation.

word - a unit of language, consisting of one or more spoken sounds or
their written representation, that functions as a principal carrier of
meaning.

As per XML spec, "Extensible Markup Language, abbreviated XML ..."

I am convinced about the correctness of these definitions (taken, from
www.dictionary.com, which I am following since many years, and regard
highly).

So, for me, XML is, abbreviation.

On 8/25/08, mike@m... <mike@m...> wrote:
> "You may be reading the above definitions a bit odd, but it certainly
> isn't clear. It does in fact *not* say that the acronym must form a
> word"
>
> The definition starts "acronym - a word formed..." seems to me to a clear statement that it must be a word. I think that a word is something more than just a sequence of letters; there are two ways in which we could define what is meant by a word (in a given language) which should be familiar to all who use XML! One is the idea of being well-formed, which I suppose in this context is the same as pronounceable. The other is more strict and implies a defined semantic context, fitting in with a schema (in this case a dictionary). Commonly when defining "acronym" the first is used - so that laser, radar and opec all qualify; however in the cases of laser and radar the acronym has entered common usage to such an extent that they are now defined as words and people forget their origin. There are certainly people who insist on the second definition of word being used, but these tend to be linguists rather than users of the acronyms.
>
> The point still remains that XML does not fit either definition. It is not a word, just a sequence of letters so it can only be an abbreviation, not an acronym.
>
> Mike


-- 
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi


transparent
Print
Mail
Like It
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent