Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives


Re: [xml-dev] Best spell-checkers for XML?

From: David Carver <d_a_carver@-----.--->
To: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@------.--->
Date: 6/20/2008 7:45:00 PM
Jonathan Robie wrote:
> I have recently started using aspell for spell-checking Docbook 
> documents, and it seems to work well. What other tools are available, 
> especially free and open source offerings? What are the advantages and 
> disadvantages of different spell checkers for XML?
The Eclipse Web Standard Tools platform has a built in spellchecker, and 
the XML editors included work well with it.  You have the ability to add 
your own custom dictionaries as well.   I've used the eclipse tools to 
do docbook editing and publication, and they work quite well.  Best of 
all it's all open source and free.

You can read more about the XML abilities in my blog post about creating 
an XML IDE with eclipse.

http://intellectualcramps.blogspot.com/2008/06/creating-xml-ide-with-eclipse.html

If you need help getting things setup let me know.


Dave


transparent
Print
Mail
Like It
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent