Altova Mailing List Archives
>xml-dev Archive Home
>Thread Prev - CSS does not use the XML syntax. Why not?
Re: [xml-dev] CSS does not use the XML syntax. Why not?
To: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@-------.---.-->
Date: 6/23/2008 3:51:00 PM
Rick Jelliffe wrote: > Costello, Roger L. wrote: >> Hi Folks, >> >> CSS does not use the XML syntax. Why not? >> > Cause it had to fit into attribute values? History matters: The first CSS W3C recommendation for CSS is dated 17 Dec 1996. At that time, only a single XML working draft existed and it was only about 30 days old. That is probably the main reason. Earlier in 1996 the idea of an SGML syntax for CSS was raised on the www-style mailing list. It was quickly dismissed as impractical: all pain for little gain; vendors were already anxious to standardize CSS; browsers did not commonly implement SGML parsers. (Recall that part of the motivation for XML was to obtain many of the benefits of SGML but sacrificing the syntactic flexibility of SGML in exchange for something easier to implement.) Clearly, if one were to be designing CSS from scratch today many compelling arguments for an XML syntax could be made. Equally or more compelling arguments could be made for the current syntax. Perhaps the thing to do, by someone who has a use at hand for an XML syntax, would be to start in the same way people have started on a similar question for XQuery: Define an XML syntax for CSS and also write an XSLT program that reads such XML and emits plain text CSS in the current syntax. -t