ok I don't think this is an actual help wanted, thus I think it is a
prescription for what should be required for the future. I don't think
that will happen with the first one:

Translating most schema languages into schema independent prose does
not seem doable, because most schemas have less information than is
found in prose. If it was doable, by direct translation of the
schemas, it would be automatable.

Cheers,
Bryan Rasmussen



On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Costello, Roger L. <costello@m...> wrote:
>
> Wanted: persons with the ability to translate schemas into
> schema-language-independent prose...
>
> Wanted: persons with the ability to describe the assembly of simple,
> independent XML vocabularies into an integrated complex structure...
>
> http://www.xfront.com/want-a-new-breed-of-developer/
>
>
> /Roger
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
> subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>
>