Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives


RE: [xml-dev] What is the "market share" of Relax NG vs XSD schema ?

From: "Michael Kay" <mike@--------.--->
To: "'Ben Stover'" <bxstover@-----.--.-->,"'xml-dev'" <xml-dev@-----.---.--->
Date: 4/9/2008 9:22:00 AM
> 
> Why is Relax NG not becoming popular?
> Looking at its properties and advantages over XSD it should 
> become the one and only schema defintion language
> 

It's an old story. Why did the Dvorak keyboard not become popular? Why
aren't we all using Macs? Why do we use ludicrously insecure email protocols
that flood the world with spam, when we could have adopted X.400? Technical
quality was never enough to ensure success; the world will not beat a path
to your door just because you have a better mousetrap.

When it comes to standards adoption, most people will not adopt X unless
they believe that everyone else will adopt X. So success depends on having a
convincing endorsement from organizations that have the reputation to either
predict the future or create it. Relax NG has never had that endorsement.
(And indeed, ISO doesn't have that reputation.)

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/


transparent
Print
Mail
Like It
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent