-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Marshall, Steven (SKM) writes:

Marshall, Steven (SKM) writes:

> Anybody know what is going on here [With the ISO19139 schema docs]?
> Is .NET more stringent in its validation than oXygen?  Even if we
> ask oXygen to use the MSXML.NET engine to validate them, we get
> different results.  It's difficult to post any of the schema info,
> because there is a total of well over a megabyte of it.  Initially
> we'd just like to know if anyone has come up against this sort of
> problem, and more important, has found a way

For what it's worth, XSV checks gco/gco.xsd with only one problem, and
that's not relevant to the question, in that it is caused by a stale
RDDL document on the Schematron site.

It's not obvious what the correct 'root' schema document is, if I
should have tried something else, please let me know.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@i...
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHq1CSkjnJixAXWBoRAnCLAJ0dVl0o1hEzNtJ3/525OsAl5GeH7gCeLNkr
eA0hojCeIj0CaY0nPpAgCpM=
=GFK8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----