Dmitry Turin wrote:
> Jonathan,
>
> JR>> - Who are the people who recognize their need to cooperate using a
> JR>> technology like yours, instead of existing standards or proprietary
> JR>> approaches, and will help you to get this accepted as a standard?
> DT> (1) Applied specialist (phisicists, biologists, etc),
> DT> who by itself (independently) must develop informational system
> DT> (1.1) heavy to explain for programmers
> DT> (1.2) have no time
> DT> (1.3) have no money
> DT> (2) Workman in small business
> DT> (3) Teacher in university
> (4) Personal internet sites, including wiki-s and blog-s
>
> JR>> Good answers to these questions will help you know where to go with the
> JR>> proposed standard to make it happen.
> DT> How you estimate my answers ?
> DT> Is it right, realistic ?
> DT> What i forgot ?
> Leave a comment ?
>   

Hi Dmitry,

I don't personally think you've identified a group that is likely to 
push this through the standardization process, but my opinion doesn't 
matter, theirs does. In general, the implementors of a technology push 
the standards (look at the participants in any W3C Working Group, Java 
JSR, or ISO Committee), though users sometimes do this too (e.g. J.P. 
Morgan was a real driver in AMQP).

If you think this needs to be a standard, go find your champions and 
make it happen. If you can't find them, that might be an indication that 
this isn't going to happen.

Jonathan