Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives


RE: [xml-dev] "Open XML" et al... Blech... Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?

From: "Michael Kay" <mike@--------.--->
To: "'Bill Kearney'" <wkearney@-------.--->,<xml-dev@-----.---.--->
Date: 9/7/2007 1:39:00 PM
> > Microsoft has been paid more than enough for Office and Windows.
> 
> According to who?  You?  And what gives you this right?

It seems odd to challenge someone's right to make a statement, rather than
challenging what they are saying. If you disagree with the assertion, please
explain why.

Office and Windows are good products and are highly successful because they
meet user needs, but they are also outrageously profitable. The high profits
are derived essentially because (a) there's a natural tendency in the user
community to converge on a single product, thus creating an effective
monopoly, and (b) the beneficiary of such a monopoly also benefits from the
existence of a copyright law that was designed to reward individual
impoverished writers but now allows mega-corporations to exploit the very
individuals it was designed to protect.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/


transparent
Print
Mail
Like It
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent