On 9/2/07, Len Bullard <cbullard@h...> wrote:
 > A revealing point is that once one gets away from the 'bloids like  
Groklaw
 > or the dedicated topic bloids, this isn't being covered  
extensively by the
 > legitimate press.

Mainstream:

Microsoft puts Office Open XML format up for international vote &#x2013;  
Seattle P-I
Microsoft format fight with rivals to intensify &#x2013; Financial Times
Microsoft pressed partners in Sweden to vote for OOXML - Washington Post

Trade press:

Sweden's OOXML vote declared invalid - Infoworld
Microsoft Open XML standards vote foments politics, dismay &#x2013; CNET
ISO boards face OOXML deadline pressure &#x2013; Inquirer (UK)
Microsoft takes off gloves in open documents battle - Computerworld
Microsoft: OOXML free from proprietary hooks - ZDNet
Microsoft's OOXML provokes standards turmoil in France - Computerworld
Microsoft employee offered incentives for OOXML support &#x2013; PC World
Microsoft pressed partners in Sweden to vote for OOXML &#x2013; PC World
Microsoft accused of rigging OOXML votes &#x2013; PC World
Microsoft Pressed Swedish Partners to Vote for Open XML &#x2013; PC World
Linux Foundation recommends ISO vote No on OOXML &#x2013; The Inquirer (UK)
Microsoft's OOXML 'choice' argument squashed &#x2013; Builder AY

 >  The business world is largely unconcerned

The evidence supports that statement about as much as it does the  
previous
one about press obliviouslness.   The Financial Times, in particular,  
does not
waste ink on subjects that are not interesting to business. -Tim