Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives


Re: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace?

From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@-----.--->
To: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@-----.--->
Date: 8/3/2007 10:22:00 AM
On 8/2/07, Costello, Roger L. <costello@m...> wrote:
> 4. Is it in the best interest of the marketplace to have a single,
> all-encompassing data validation language, or is it better to have
> multiple data validation languages that work together?

Do you have any information on the current state of the marketplace?

Are you sure that XML Schema isn't already lined up as the single, all
encompassing validation language once people move on from DTD?  (as
in, the only market share it will be gaining is from DTD, as the rest
is negligible)

I've asked this before (so I'll ask it again at the likelihood of
being flamed) - where are the Schematron implemenations?  As far as I
can see, it's a specification and a couple of stylesheets...  A while
back I really wanted to augment my XSD with XPath and looked at
Schematron, but there was nothing there - just a new language to learn
and stylesheet to ultimately turn that language into another
stylesheet - not exactly enough to warrant the time investment to
learn the language when most people know XPath already (and writing
the XPath directly you're not constrained by limitations of the
"Skeleton" transform).

To be honest I was underwhelmed and annoyed that there was so much
apparent positivity for something that didn't have any substance.  I
don't know what its like now, hence my question - does Schematron have
any market share for XML Schema to take when 1.1 is released?



-- 
http://andrewjwelch.com


transparent
Print
Mail
Like It
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent