Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >xml-dev Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? >Thread Next - RE: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? RE: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language -good or bad for the marketplace?To: 'Chris Scott' <scott.chris@-----.--->,"'Costello, Roger L.'" <costello@-----.---> Date: 8/7/2007 1:45:00 AM > > > 2. Is grammar validation of a fundamentally different > nature than rule validation? > > I think so. Say you've got a schema that says an element representing data for a month must have at most 31 children, and you decide you want to be a bit more precise and say it must be 30 for some months and 31 for others and occasionally 28 or 29. Does this refinement mean you are doing something of a fundamentally different nature? I think not. It does mean that you've crossed the limits of what can be done with a grammar-based approach, but surely we should make it as easy and seamless for people to cross that boundary as we can? Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
