Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives


Re: [xml-dev] json v. xml

From: Richard Salz <rsalz@--.---.--->
To: "derek denny-brown" <zuligag@-----.--->
Date: 1/4/2007 6:15:00 PM
At one point the XML community divided itself into two parts: doc-heads 
and data-heads.  I don't see what the former group gets out of JSON. As 
for data-heads, it may well be that JSON is a better fit (80/20) when one 
end of the link is monoculture (more PC to call it a browser on a PC, I 
guess). That environment doesn't describe all the places where XML 
data-heads need to get their data.

I view the JSON vs XML debate as optimizing for an important common case 
and don't see any technical need to raise a ruckus.

        /r$

--
STSM
Senior Security Architect
DataPower SOA Appliances


transparent
Print
Mail
Like It
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent