Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >xml-dev Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - Re: [xml-dev] SGML complexity [Thread Next] xslt 2.0 impl. complexity (was Re: [xml-dev] SGML complexity)To: xml dev <xml-dev@-----.---.---> Date: 9/2/2006 11:21:00 PM --- Dave Pawson <davep@d...> wrote: > Elliotte Harold wrote: > > While there's certainly a lot of value in 2.0, > there are also a number > > of questionable items. The bar for fully > implementing it is just way > > too high to interest a lot of folks. > Except that the additional value in 2.0 for the > 'usable'/useful subset > is well worth it (IMHO). > don't bother with the unwanted/questionable value > but take advantage of > the additions That is certainly possibly to do as a user (and obviously a useful way to think about it), but unfortunately not possible for implementors: they can not (or at least should not) just ignore questionable parts, as tempting as it may be. And I think Elliotte was specifically pointing out that problem. -+ Tatu +- __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
