Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >xml-dev Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - >Thread Next - Re: [xml-dev] Including a schema and its redefinition Including a schema and its redefinitionTo: xml-dev@-----.---.---, -------------@--.--- Date: 9/6/2006 9:50:00 AM <span lang=EN-GB style='font-size: 10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>Hi all,<o:p></o:p> <span lang=EN-GB style='font-size: 10.0pt;font-family:Arial'><o:p> </o:p> <span lang=EN-GB style='font-size: 10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>Attached you can find an example of inclusion of a schema and its redefinition.<o:p></o:p> <span lang=EN-GB style='font-size: 10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>I’ve read the W3C Schema recommendation but it’s not clear to me if include.xsd is a valid schema.<o:p></o:p> <span lang=EN-GB style='font-size: 10.0pt;font-family:Arial'><o:p> </o:p> <span lang=EN-GB style='font-size: 10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>I’m trying to validate include.xml to see if include.xsd is a valid schema.<o:p></o:p> <span lang=EN-GB style='font-size: 10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>Most schema validators say it’s not valid (because a_type is being declared more than once), but a few of them say it’s OK.<o:p></o:p> <span lang=EN-GB style='font-size: 10.0pt;font-family:Arial'><o:p> </o:p> <span lang=EN-GB style='font-size: 10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>Do you think include.xsd is a valid 1.0 schema?<o:p></o:p> <span lang=EN-GB style='font-size: 10.0pt;font-family:Arial'><o:p> </o:p> <span lang=EN-GB style='font-size: 10.0pt;font-family:Arial'><o:p> </o:p> <span lang=EN-GB style='font-size: 10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>Thank you.<o:p></o:p> <span lang=EN-GB style='font-size: 10.0pt;font-family:Arial'><o:p> </o:p> redefine_a.xsd include.xml a.xsd include.xsd | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
