--- James Fuller <jim.fuller@r...> wrote:

> Melvin Chin wrote:
> > May I seek some opinions on this topic/proposal?
>
===================================================================
> > To extend XML spec just a little to permit use of
> "</>" (GXTC)
> > to be placed wherever it is permitted in the
> current XML spec
> > to place a closing tag.  The semantics will be to
> effect a
> > closing of the nearest open tag before the
> position of GXTC.
> >
>
===================================================================
> 
> wondering what benefit to this other then some
> syntatic human orientated 
> sugar ?

Actually, I wouldn't really see it as human-oriented
at all (like Elliotte pointed out, removing the name
would be against human readability) thing, but rather
a simple compression method of redundant information.

And yes, chances of it happening are slim to none,
whether one considers it a good or bad thing.

-+ Tatu +-


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com