Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives

xml-dev



RE: [xml-dev] Restrictions on existence of attributes? - 7/1/2006 12:34:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Restrictions on existence of attributes? - 7/2/2006 6:08:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Restrictions on existence of attributes? - 7/2/2006 7:50:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces and attributes.. - 7/2/2006 9:07:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Restrictions on existence of attributes? - 7/3/2006 7:36:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Restrictions on existence of attributes? - 7/3/2006 10:10:00 AM
OFFTOPIC: Planet Quest - 7/3/2006 12:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] xsd and org.apache.commons.digester.Digester - 7/3/2006 2:58:00 PM
Hijacked XSD permathread - was Re: [xml-dev] Restrictions on existenceof attributes? - 7/3/2006 9:00:00 PM
Math on the web without MathML (CSS 2.1 rendering for HTML and XML) - 7/4/2006 10:56:00 AM
Re: Problem with AJAX and Expression Engine - 7/5/2006 1:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] OFFTOPIC: Planet Quest - 7/5/2006 3:37:00 PM
Extreme Markup Languages 2006 - Final Program Posted - 7/5/2006 9:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] abs() function (was random title borrowed from another thread) - 7/5/2006 10:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Restrictions on existence of attributes? - 7/6/2006 12:26:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Restrictions on existence of attributes? - 7/6/2006 6:57:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] FYI: monmason@msn.com doesn't want to be on this list - 7/6/2006 3:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] trying to use abs() - 7/6/2006 4:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] trying to use abs() - 7/6/2006 4:34:00 PM
The Best Technologies Don't Win - 7/6/2006 9:32:00 PM
Transforming a DTD to XML syntax (Tree) - 7/6/2006 10:11:00 PM
FOAF in SOAP - 7/7/2006 1:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The Best Technologies Don't Win - 7/7/2006 1:55:00 PM
[ANN] Kernow 1.4 - 7/7/2006 1:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The Best Technologies Don't Win - 7/7/2006 2:21:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The Best Technologies Don't Win - 7/7/2006 3:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The Best Technologies Don't Win - 7/7/2006 4:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The Best Technologies Don't Win - 7/7/2006 5:47:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The Best Technologies Don't Win - 7/7/2006 5:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The Best Technologies Don't Win - 7/7/2006 7:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The Best Technologies Don't Win - 7/7/2006 7:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The Best Technologies Don't Win - 7/8/2006 8:23:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The Best Technologies Don't Win - 7/8/2006 11:30:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The Best Technologies Don't Win - 7/8/2006 12:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The Best Technologies Don't Win - 7/8/2006 6:17:00 PM
Re: trying to use abs() - 7/9/2006 12:10:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] The Best Technologies Don't Win - 7/10/2006 3:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The Best Technologies Don't Win - 7/10/2006 4:06:00 PM
FW: Extreme Markup Languages 2006 -the place to be in August for people who think about markup - 7/10/2006 5:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The Best Technologies Don't Win - 7/10/2006 6:56:00 PM
Call for Presentations - OASIS Adoption Forum - 7/10/2006 8:12:00 PM
RE: [x3d] Re: [x3d-public] Important FLUX Announcement - 7/10/2006 11:20:00 PM
Announce: TeXML 2.0 - 7/11/2006 2:47:00 AM
XPointer example - 7/11/2006 11:06:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] The Best Technologies Don't Win - 7/11/2006 12:45:00 PM
Article: "Manage XML data sets for security" - 7/11/2006 6:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPointer example - 7/12/2006 12:03:00 PM
md5sum / sha1sum for XML? - 7/12/2006 7:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] md5sum / sha1sum for XML? - 7/12/2006 7:47:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The Best Technologies Don't Win - 7/12/2006 9:19:00 PM
XSD Imports with location - 7/13/2006 1:18:00 AM
the fall of XPath over filesystem - 7/13/2006 3:12:00 AM
Copying text from a source, then converting to XML - 7/13/2006 5:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] md5sum / sha1sum for XML? - 7/14/2006 4:22:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win - 7/14/2006 4:27:00 PM
Announce: XPontus XML Editor - 7/15/2006 12:34:00 AM
Announce: XPontus XML Editor - 7/15/2006 12:44:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win - 7/15/2006 2:16:00 PM
Announce: XPontus XML Editor 1.0.0RC1 - 7/15/2006 2:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win - 7/15/2006 5:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Default namespace for attributes? - 7/15/2006 5:50:00 PM
Announce: XPontus XML Editor 1.0.0RC1 - 7/15/2006 6:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Default namespace for attributes? - 7/15/2006 6:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Default namespace for attributes? - 7/16/2006 4:41:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win - 7/16/2006 10:49:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win - 7/16/2006 10:55:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Default namespace for attributes? - 7/16/2006 12:39:00 PM
Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"? - 7/16/2006 1:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"? - 7/16/2006 1:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"? - 7/16/2006 2:28:00 PM
RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"? - 7/17/2006 10:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"? - 7/18/2006 7:41:00 AM
RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/18/2006 8:00:00 AM
RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"? - 7/18/2006 11:36:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"? - 7/18/2006 1:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"? - 7/18/2006 1:46:00 PM
Re: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"? - 7/18/2006 2:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visibleWeb"? - 7/20/2006 5:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visibleWeb"? - 7/21/2006 5:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"? - 7/18/2006 8:00:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"? - 7/18/2006 8:16:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"? - 7/18/2006 8:19:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Default namespace for attributes? - 7/16/2006 3:05:00 PM
Re: Default namespace for attributes? - 7/16/2006 3:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Default namespace for attributes? - 7/17/2006 8:48:00 AM
[ANN] XML Studio v6 --Web 2.0, Enterprise XML, and Mobile Internettool unification - 7/17/2006 10:47:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win - 7/17/2006 2:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] md5sum / sha1sum for XML? - 7/17/2006 2:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win - 7/17/2006 2:48:00 PM
Basic namespace question - 7/17/2006 3:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win - 7/17/2006 9:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win - 7/17/2006 9:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visibleWeb"? - 7/18/2006 1:14:00 AM
[ANN] XML Nanny 2.0 with support for RNG, RNC, and Schematron - 7/18/2006 2:57:00 AM
[ANN] XML Studio v6-- Web 2.0, Enterprise XML, and Mobile Internettool unification - 7/18/2006 9:42:00 AM
Schema Extension and validation of an instance - 7/18/2006 1:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Transforming ™ to ™ - 7/18/2006 2:19:00 PM
Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"? - 7/18/2006 2:43:00 PM
Patents on XML software, file formats, schemas, vocabularies - 7/18/2006 8:43:00 PM
Re: Patents on XML software, file formats, schemas, vocabularies - 7/18/2006 8:47:00 PM
Help with terms for kind of schema I'm building - 7/18/2006 8:59:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Help with terms for kind of schema I'm building - 7/18/2006 10:07:00 PM
Escape from Paris was: Re: [xml-dev] RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/19/2006 9:48:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Escape from Paris was: Re: [xml-dev] RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/19/2006 12:32:00 PM
[Announce]DataDirect XQuery Webinar Tomorrow (Thursday July 20) - 7/19/2006 3:34:00 PM
RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/19/2006 5:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/19/2006 6:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/19/2006 6:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/19/2006 7:13:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/19/2006 8:59:00 PM
[xml-dev] XSD to code classes converter tools - 7/19/2006 7:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? because XML has not gratefull degradation. - 7/20/2006 9:18:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Patents on XML software, file formats, schemas, vocabularies - 7/20/2006 2:55:00 PM
RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/20/2006 4:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/20/2006 4:55:00 PM
Re: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/20/2006 7:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/20/2006 9:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/20/2006 9:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/21/2006 8:45:00 AM
XML Envelopes... - 7/21/2006 1:24:00 AM
XML Versioning - 7/21/2006 3:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Versioning - 7/21/2006 3:20:00 PM
Streaming Validation for XML: STX goes Schematron - 7/21/2006 5:28:00 PM
[SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/21/2006 8:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'? - 7/21/2006 9:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'? - 7/21/2006 10:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/22/2006 9:28:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'? - 7/22/2006 5:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/22/2006 6:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'? - 7/22/2006 8:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'? - 7/22/2006 9:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/23/2006 8:02:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/23/2006 9:10:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/23/2006 9:37:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/23/2006 10:23:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/23/2006 10:34:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/23/2006 6:20:00 PM
CLAX - Client-side functionality - 7/23/2006 7:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] CLAX - Client-side functionality - OFFTOPIC, Firefoxsupports SVG - 7/23/2006 8:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] CLAX - Client-side functionality - 7/23/2006 9:23:00 PM
OFFTOPIC, Firefox supports SVG - 7/23/2006 9:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] CLAX - Client-side functionality - 7/23/2006 9:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] CLAX - Client-side functionality - 7/23/2006 9:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] CLAX - Client-side functionality - 7/23/2006 9:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] CLAX - Client-side functionality - 7/23/2006 10:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] CLAX - Client-side functionality - 7/24/2006 7:47:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] CLAX - Client-side functionality - 7/24/2006 8:09:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] CLAX - Client-side functionality - 7/24/2006 8:19:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] CLAX - Client-side functionality - 7/24/2006 8:29:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] CLAX - Client-side functionality - 7/24/2006 8:59:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] CLAX - Client-side functionality - 7/24/2006 9:41:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] CLAX - Client-side functionality - 7/24/2006 10:10:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/24/2006 11:19:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/24/2006 1:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] CLAX - Client-side functionality - 7/24/2006 1:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'? - 7/24/2006 4:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'? - 7/24/2006 6:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] CLAX - Client-side functionality - 7/24/2006 8:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] CLAX - Client-side functionality - 7/24/2006 10:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/25/2006 9:53:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] CLAX - Client-side functionality - 7/27/2006 11:16:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] CLAX - Client-side functionality - 7/28/2006 6:06:00 AM
google appliance - 7/21/2006 8:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] google appliance - 7/21/2006 8:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'? - 7/21/2006 9:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'? - 7/22/2006 2:56:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'? - 7/22/2006 4:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'? - 7/22/2006 10:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/22/2006 10:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'? - 7/23/2006 12:26:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'? - 7/23/2006 1:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'? - 7/23/2006 12:56:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML onthe'visible Web'? - 7/23/2006 2:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'? - 7/23/2006 1:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/23/2006 9:37:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/24/2006 1:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'? - 7/24/2006 2:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'? - 7/23/2006 1:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'? - 7/23/2006 8:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/23/2006 9:44:00 PM
Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. something with legacysupport.. carries business data better.. - 7/23/2006 10:24:00 PM
Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. something with legacy support.. carries business data better.. - 7/23/2006 10:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. somethingwith legacy support.. carries business data better.. - 7/24/2006 2:01:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. something with legacy support.. carries business data better.. - 7/24/2006 6:41:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. something with legacy support.. carries business data better.. - 7/24/2006 9:11:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. something withlegacy support.. carries business data better.. - 7/24/2006 11:15:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues..something with legacy support.. carries business data better.. - 7/24/2006 11:54:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. something with legacy support.. carries business data better.. - 7/24/2006 11:58:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. something with legacy support.. carries business data better.. - 7/24/2006 11:59:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. something with legacy support.. carries business data better.. - 7/24/2006 12:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. something with legacy support.. carries business data better.. - 7/24/2006 2:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. somethingwith legacy support.. carries business data better.. - 7/24/2006 10:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. something withlegacy support.. carries business data better.. - 7/25/2006 1:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. somethingwith legacy support.. carries business data better.. - 7/26/2006 3:59:00 AM
Spurious recipient ? - 7/22/2006 3:56:00 PM
client side XML functionalities - 7/23/2006 8:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Envelopes... - 7/23/2006 10:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/24/2006 9:31:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/24/2006 10:56:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Versioning - 7/24/2006 1:40:00 PM
Localizable XML description of form - 7/24/2006 4:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] CLAX - Client-side functionality - 7/24/2006 5:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] CLAX - Client-side functionality - 7/24/2006 5:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'? - 7/24/2006 6:12:00 PM
Announce: GUIXML web browser - 7/24/2006 6:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/24/2006 6:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/24/2006 10:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'? - 7/25/2006 12:00:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'? - 7/25/2006 1:02:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/25/2006 7:36:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/25/2006 11:49:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/25/2006 12:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Clustering Customization Vs Global Standards - 7/25/2006 12:01:00 AM
XSD to c structure - 7/25/2006 1:08:00 AM
Bussines model idea. - 7/25/2006 7:54:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/25/2006 10:36:00 AM
Schema question - 7/26/2006 2:25:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] how to design an HTML file to contain an XML file? - 7/26/2006 3:38:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Schema question - 7/26/2006 4:07:00 AM
Towards s-expression based XPath/XSLT implementation - 7/26/2006 5:36:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] how to design an HTML file to contain an XML file? - 7/26/2006 8:24:00 AM
"XMLSON" Idea. - 7/26/2006 10:54:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Schema question - 7/26/2006 1:00:00 PM
Fw: [XCON] Consensus 66-03: Schema vs RelaxNG - 7/27/2006 8:52:00 AM
Well, time for RDF - 7/27/2006 11:34:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] how to design an HTML file to contain an XML file? - 7/27/2006 11:35:00 AM
How to embed xml in an html file, and parse the file using Sax? - 7/27/2006 6:20:00 PM
[xml-dev] How we can convert pdf data into xml? - 7/29/2006 4:35:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/29/2006 4:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? - 7/29/2006 4:39:00 PM
RDF Graph Modelling Language - 7/29/2006 9:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing XML Schema in Java - 7/30/2006 12:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Parsing XML Schema in Java - 7/30/2006 9:40:00 PM


transparent
Print
Mail
Digg
delicious
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent