Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives


RE: [xml-dev] 10th anniversary of the annoucement of XML ..need help

From: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <len.bullard@----------.--->
To: "Gavin Thomas Nicol" <gtn@----.--->,"XML List Developers" <xml-dev@-----.---.--->
Date: 6/6/2006 1:06:00 PM
And in IDEAS/IADS (Unisys/USAMICOM) that supported dtd-less stylesheet
based coding. IDEAS was the commercial version of IADS with DTD batch
support as-needed.  IADS was offered free to the world and provided an
example for Yuri and Dr. Goldfarb that the techniques for markup that
would become XML did work in hypermedia.  It was presented at the CALS
and SGML conferences.   IADS came the closest to XML because it's
developers made a very noticeable break with SGML conformance by
embracing syntax-conformance without DTDs.  It was beat up for that at
the time, but with XML's success, it became evident the Unisys
programmers had gotten it all right some six years before XML.  

XML is outcome of many separate efforts to make SGML suitable for
hypertext.  There are Rashomonic viewpoints about the history depending
on which projects one worked at the time, but collectively, almost all
of XML features had been tried prior to the working groups beginning at
the W3C.  Yuri had the benefit of seeing these so there was no doubt
about the technical outcome, just the rate of adoption.  Some were
surprised the uptake was so fast; others weren't.  The piles of money
being lobbed at web companies at that point provided a mighty suction
and the shortcomings of HTML-centric browsers were becoming evident to
those who had not already been exposed to more advanced systems.

len


From: Gavin Thomas Nicol [mailto:gtn@r...] 

On Jun 5, 2006, at 4:38 PM, Bullard, Claude L ((Len)) wrote:

> 1.  90% of the work was done before the work started because of the 
> long history of SGML.
>
> 2.  There was no lack of expertise with years of experience.

I think these were two key points. The requirement for SGML
compatibility, plus the expertise from the field that guided SGML
feature selection, resulted in broad consensus. There were already a
number of XML-like subsets out in the wild, and in particular, in 2
commercial browser-like applications (SoftQuad and EBT).

BTW. I should note that the ERB/WG split happened after the group got
big enough to justify the split. There was a lot of formative work done
before the ERB split off.


transparent
Print
Mail
Like It
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent