 |
|
|
I think that is the case precisely. Although Topic Maps now have the
alternative subject maps and the bifurcation begins anew. The CG list
has Conceptual Graphs as a notation and I often wonder if all of these
don't have some commons for standardization. The problem, of course,
is to get a commons that has the simplicity and easy applicability that
it gets used quickly because it is useful quickly. Otherwise, it keeps
baking.
len
-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Jelliffe [mailto:rjelliffe@a...]
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 1:21 PM
To: XML List Developers
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] 10th anniversary of the annoucement of XML ..need
help
Bullard, Claude L (Len) said:
> Isn't an FEA Data Requirements Model just another Topic Map?
I wonder whether one of the functions of a low-level general purpose
modeling technology such as HyTime (and RDF and XLinks?) is to expose
the building blocks that *should* have been standardized. So HyTime has
lead to Topic Maps which are increasingly inflential and credible.
|
|
| |
These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.
| |
| |
|
|
|
