Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives


Enforcing use of xsi:type

From: "Paul Spencer" <xml-dev-list@--------.--.-->
To: "Xml-Dev" <xml-dev@-----.---.--->
Date: 6/7/2006 12:20:00 PM
In the Election Markup Language, people may use a variety of identifiers
depending on the type of election, country etc. The schema (XSD) therefore
allows use of xsi:type in the instance so that the correct validation can be
used for each identifier. I don't think that there is any way in XML Schema
of forcing the use of the xsi:type attribute in the instance, so I am
currently using Schematron rules to do this. Am I correct, or have I missed
something obvious?

Before people point out that I am allowing the sender of the message to say
what type of identifier they have, the Schematron (which changes for each
scenario) also defines the allowed values for xsi:type. I would keep this,
but it would be good if the schema itself enforced something as a hint to
implementers to look at the spec and see what they need to do.

Regards

Paul Spencer


transparent
Print
Mail
Like It
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent