Robin Berjon wrote:

> I'm not saying that such an API wouldn't be nice to have, but the 
> statement you make is akin certainly does not match the expectations of 
> the folks I've been working with who have long been waiting for NVDL 
> implementations. What we need is tools to validate compound documents, 
> nothing more. There's quite a bunch of folks out there who might be 
> interested in validating the likes of XHTML+SVG.

Yes, exactly. The main motivation for creating JNVDL was need for 
compound document aware validator for Relaxed XHTML validator 
(http://www.relaxed.cz). Currently Relaxed uses manually created RELAX 
NG schemas for validation of XHTML, XHTML+SVG, XHTML+MathML, 
XHTML+SVG+MathML. But this approach doesn't scale very well if you want 
to cover all possible combinations of XHTML + SVG, MathML, SMIL, 
VoiceXML, RDF,... NVDL can simplify this task significantly.

			Jirka

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
   Jirka Kosek     e-mail: jirka@k...     http://www.kosek.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
   Profesionální školení a poradenství v oblasti technologií XML.
      Podívejte se na náš nově spuštěný web http://DocBook.cz
        Podrobný přehled školení http://xmlguru.cz/skoleni/
------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Nejbližší termíny školení:
        ** DocBook 15.-17.5.2006 ** XSL-FO 12.-13.6.2006 **
     ** XSLT 23.-26.10.2006 ** XML schémata 13.-15.11.2006 **
------------------------------------------------------------------
   http://xmlguru.cz    Blog mostly about XML for English readers
------------------------------------------------------------------


S/MIME Cryptographic Signature