 |
|
|
Michael Kay wrote:
>>would you say the same about phonetic sounds or
>>alpha-numerics?
>
>
> Yes, I would. They don't mean anything without some external information
> about the protocol in use, e.g. "this is Portuguese speech".
Sure. So binary XML is not a problem, right?
>
> Of course, as humans we're quite good at guessing the protocol from the
> content, because there's usually enough redundancy in the message, but only
> from a limited range of protocols that we happen to know about.
Who is not a human on this list? As such, aren't there ways of determining?
just having fun,
-Rob
>
> Michael Kay
> http://www.saxonica.com/
>
>
>
|
|
| |
These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.
| |
| |
|
|
|
