 |
|
|
Hi, folks-
I've been playing around with the <oXygen /> XML editor, seeing how
SVG-handy it is, and I've run into a question.
I don't normally but DOCTYPE declarations in my SVG files, since I declare
the namespaces in the root (and since it causes some problems in script with
import and parsing a file that does have a DOCTYPE declaration). But the
Oxygen editor says it's not valid if I don't have one; in fact, it doesn't
even recognize it as SVG.
So, can anyone confirm or categorically deny that one needs the DOCTYPE
declaration to have a valid SVG file? This is counter to what I have gleaned
from the SVG Spec (though I can't find a reference at the moment).
Also, do I need a <?xml version="1.0" standalone="no"?> header, and if so,
when? Oxygen doesn't care if I do or not, but I just want to Do The Right
Thing.
Regards-
Doug
doug . schepers @ vectoreal.com
www.vectoreal.com ...for scalable solutions.
|
|
| |
These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.
| |
| |
|
|
|
