Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >xml-dev Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - RE: [xml-dev] Better design: "flatter is better" or "nesting is better" ? [Thread Next] RE: [xml-dev] Better design: "flatter is better" or "nesting isbetter" ?To: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@-------.---.--> Date: 10/2/2005 8:41:00 AM On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 15:02 +1000, Rick Jelliffe wrote: > Also, the "elimiate non-essential tags" rule flies in the > face of the capabilities of XML Schemas, where introducing extra > layers is the only way to get different content models: XML Schemas > forces you to use elements where attributes might be more natural. Which sounds a bit like add tags simply to keep the validator happy? If you are operating in a straight jacket situation then yes. If you want to apply your own authoring constraints then this should be unnecessary. > Furthermore, for documents that will be sent for publising, there > is a kind of "critical mass" or minimum-density-of-metadata without > which a document is useless for publishing. If you mean markup within low level elements I'd agree, e.g. inlines within a para. Otherwise I don't follow the logic there Rick. > It would be better > to re-phrase that "eliminate speculative tags" IMHO. Speculative == redundant (for todays known applications)? regards DaveP | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
