Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives


RE: [xml-dev] Interesting pair of comments (was Re: [xml-dev]

From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@-------.---.-->
To: xml-dev@-----.---.---
Date: 7/11/2005 3:18:00 AM
> Data binding tools use schemas for type information so you could say they
> use them for PSVI [in a way] but not validation. Many of the interop
> problems are of the form "my tool can bind to schemas with construct X
> while my business partner's can't". A real world example of this is trying
> to send nillable types back and forth between Java and .NET XML Web
> Service toolkits.

It is a funny question isn't it:  can you have a PSVI when you have not
validated?

It's in the lax/strict ballpark I guess...you decide a priori that the
document is valid. Is that the distinguishing feature that needs to be
accommodated?  No Schema Validation Infoset (NSVI)?

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe


transparent
Print
Mail
Like It
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent