Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives


RE: [xml-dev] Why XML for Messaging?

From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@----------.--->
To: 'Christian Nentwich' <christian@----------.--->
Date: 6/1/2005 4:28:00 PM
A shared model is certainly desirable.  Is XML accepted 
again, only because 'it is there' or 'there is no better 
alternative'?

At one point, Neil A. Kipp proposed a simpler syntax that 
could do the job of XML.  RelaxNG has a simpler syntax. 
So that is a possible improvement, but again, YetAnotherOne. 

Defending XML used to be one of the principal topics of this 
list.  It is seldom necessary these days which is why it is 
a reasonable time to start questioning assumptions... or safe.

Do messages have long lifecycle requirements?  Is transparency 
an effect of the model, the syntax, or just the shared view? 

When we say 'messaging' and 'XML' in the same breath as if 
they were inseparable, the innovation bell rings.  Again, 
timeliness is everything but some games must be played a 
long ways ahead.  Even XML would not be there had some 
brave souls not stepped away from CORBA, etc., and taken a 
second look at a 'failed document format standard', and the 
only reason it was accepted readily is that an even cruder 
form had 'succeeded wildly'.

len

From: Christian Nentwich [mailto:christian@s...]

Len,

are you suggesting that we go back to CORBA? xml-dev feels like
chewing gum sometimes.

We like XML on the wire because we can read it and because, provided
you use XML Schema well and put effort into modelling, you see a
representation of your business model on the wire.

It's unfashionable here to defend XML and XML Schema... but I will.
Business analysts who look at a UML representation, coders who
translate the XSLT stuff, testers who pull messages off the wire,
support staff who pull messages off the exception queue, all see
a shared model. When they say "the adjusted date is wrong" they all
understand each other, and can talk to each other without hours of
reverse engineering and analysis.

I deal in EAI and I'll have XML for messaging any day, thanks. As for
the universities.. most of them don't see it as their job to come up
with Yet Another Infrastructure Standard. They are looking at next
generation mobile middleware and other hard problems.

A simpler XML would of course be appreciated... with the usual
requests around entities, namespaces and processing instructions.


transparent
Print
Mail
Like It
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent