>Archive Index
>xml-dev Archive Home
>Recent entries

>Thread Prev -
>Thread Next - Re: [xml-dev] REST, SOAP, Speech Acts and the mustUnderstand mode l of SOA communications (was: Re: What Does SOAP/WS Do that A REST System Can't?)

RE: [xml-dev] REST, SOAP, Speech Acts and the mustUnderstand model of SOA communications (was: Re: What Does SOAP/WS Do that A REST System Can't?)

From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@----------.--->
To: 'Michael Champion' <michaelc.champion@-----.--->, xml-dev <xml-dev@-----.---.--->
Date: 4/1/2005 2:55:00 PM

xml:mustUnderstand="log(-1)" - The recipient is free to imagine that
it understands the message fragment.

The recipient is free to imagine it understands the message fragment 
and blog the results as affirmation.

len

From: Michael Champion [mailto:michaelc.champion@g...]

On Apr 1, 2005 9:31 AM, Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@g...> wrote:
> Excellent, an enumeration is the right way to go with this. The advantage
> is that you can then dip into negative numbers:
> 
> xml:mustUnderstand="-1" - The recipient MUST NOT understand
> the message fragment.

xml:mustUnderstand="sqrt(-1)" - The recipient is free to imagine that
it understands the message fragment.

>Thread Prev -
>Thread Next - Re: [xml-dev] REST, SOAP, Speech Acts and the mustUnderstand mode l of SOA communications (was: Re: What Does SOAP/WS Do that A REST System Can't?)

>Archive Index
>xml-dev Archive Home
>Recent entries

Altova Mailing List Archives

RE: [xml-dev] REST, SOAP, Speech Acts and the mustUnderstand model of SOA communications (was: Re: What Does SOAP/WS Do that A REST System Can't?)