xml:mustUnderstand="pi()"

The recipient must realize that the meaning of message is more than
likely irrelevant as it carries a second hidden meaning, which in turn
may have a third meaning, and in fact could be an answer, posed as a
question or vise versa.

Upon receiving of the message, the only correct response is to mumble
something or pretend that a random piece of furniture has suddenly
become utterly fascinating.

The recipient must also prepare all available resources to get
consumed indefinitely in the exchange that will follow this initial
message.

Essential for spouse communications.

:DG<

On Apr 1, 2005 8:54 AM, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
<len.bullard@i...> wrote:
> xml:mustUnderstand="log(-1)" - The recipient is free to imagine that
> it understands the message fragment.
> 
> The recipient is free to imagine it understands the message fragment
> and blog the results as affirmation.
> 
> len
> 
> From: Michael Champion [mailto:michaelc.champion@g...]
> 
> On Apr 1, 2005 9:31 AM, Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@g...> wrote:
> > Excellent, an enumeration is the right way to go with this. The advantage
> > is that you can then dip into negative numbers:
> >
> > xml:mustUnderstand="-1" - The recipient MUST NOT understand
> > the message fragment.
> 
> xml:mustUnderstand="sqrt(-1)" - The recipient is free to imagine that
> it understands the message fragment.
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> 
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
> 
>