Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >xml-dev Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - Re: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ? >Thread Next - But is it fair? - An exploration of alphabets and ideograms RE: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?To: "'William J. Kammerer'" <wkammerer@--------.--->,<xml-dev@-----.---.---> Date: 3/4/2005 12:54:00 PM > I can't comment on the usability of any alphabet other than Latin, but > is it "fair" that Chinese ideograms chew up tens of thousands of code > points in Unicode? It's balanced by the unfairness that Latin letters only occupy one byte in UTF-8, whereas Chinese ideograms occupy three or four. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
