Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives


RE: [xml-dev] [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?

From: "Michael Kay" <mike@--------.--->
To: "'William J. Kammerer'" <wkammerer@--------.--->,<xml-dev@-----.---.--->
Date: 3/4/2005 12:54:00 PM
> I can't comment on the usability of any alphabet other than Latin, but
> is it "fair" that Chinese ideograms chew up tens of thousands of code
> points in Unicode? 

It's balanced by the unfairness that Latin letters only occupy one byte in
UTF-8, whereas Chinese ideograms occupy three or four.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/


transparent
Print
Mail
Like It
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent