![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >xml-dev Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] >Thread Next - RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles]To: "'XML Developers List'" <xml-dev@-----.---.---> Date: 2/1/2005 1:06:00 PM Hey Joe,
>> The Assignment element connects the Lot and Picker.
>> ["Assignment" is not really the correct name. Can someone
>> think of a better name?]
> Yes - Association.
Yes, I like that much better than Assignment. Still, I am not quite
satisfied with Association. It's such a general term. Can we come up with
a name that is more specific, e.g.,
<Lot-Picker-Association picker="John" lot="1"/>
Obviously, I really don't like that, but it is definitely more specific.
> I would assert that this is a semantic association, more than a semantic
> dependency. That is, the Picker can be removed from the lot (physically,
> in the real world) yet the lot will still remain. And vice-versa.
Good. Should I use the term association instead of dependency? Or, perhaps
there is a "physical dependency", and a "semantic association"? /Roger | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | |||
|
