Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives

xml-dev



Recommend A Java-XML Forum - 2/1/2005 12:39:00 AM
Constraints for nested elements; key and keyref - 2/1/2005 9:39:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] find with XPath over file system - 2/1/2005 12:32:00 PM
What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] - 2/1/2005 12:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] find with XPath over file system - 2/1/2005 12:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] - 2/1/2005 12:46:00 PM
Re: Re: [xml-dev] Constraints for nested elements; key and keyref - 2/1/2005 1:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] - 2/1/2005 3:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] - 2/1/2005 3:16:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] - 2/1/2005 4:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] - 2/1/2005 6:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] - 2/1/2005 6:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] - 2/1/2005 7:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] - 2/1/2005 7:18:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: 3 XML Design Principles [T2005013101A6] - 2/1/2005 8:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3Cmeeting in March - 2/1/2005 8:21:00 PM
CFP: XML, OSCON 2005 - 2/1/2005 9:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] find with XPath over file system [T2005020100AK] - 2/2/2005 12:21:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] find with XPath over file system [T2005020100AK] - 2/2/2005 3:56:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3C meeting in March - 2/2/2005 2:26:00 PM
Re: XSLT Reuse (Was: Even if you're not ... (Was: If you're going to the W3C meeting in March)) - 2/2/2005 2:37:00 PM
Re: XSLT Reuse (Was: Even if you're not ... (Was: If you're going to the W3C meeting in March)) - 2/2/2005 3:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3Cmeeting in March - 2/2/2005 3:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3C meeting in March - 2/2/2005 3:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3C meeting in March - 2/2/2005 4:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3C meeting in March - 2/2/2005 4:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3C meeting in March - 2/2/2005 4:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What is coupling? [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] [T2005020100MS] - 2/2/2005 6:04:00 PM
ANN: Amara XML Toolkit 0.9.4 - 2/2/2005 11:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3C meeting in March [T2005020200AU] - 2/2/2005 11:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3C meeting in March [T2005020200AU] - 2/2/2005 11:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Recommend A Java-XML Forum [T2005020200BW] - 2/3/2005 12:00:00 AM
xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/3/2005 11:06:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3C meeting in March [T2005020200AU] - 2/3/2005 12:27:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Recommend A Java-XML Forum [T2005020200F1] - 2/3/2005 2:40:00 PM
The BBC, Mozilla.org, and Microsoft to provide keynote speakers for XTECH 2005 --registration now open - 2/3/2005 4:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] 3 XML Design Principles - 2/3/2005 8:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3Cmeeting in March - 2/3/2005 8:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/3/2005 10:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/3/2005 11:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 12:48:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 2:06:00 PM
typing with XML Schema - 2/4/2005 2:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] typing with XML Schema - 2/4/2005 2:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 3:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 4:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 4:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 5:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 5:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 5:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 5:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 6:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 8:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 8:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 8:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 9:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 9:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 9:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 9:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 9:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 9:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 9:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 9:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 9:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 10:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 10:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 10:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 10:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 11:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/5/2005 12:03:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/7/2005 6:19:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/7/2005 7:47:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/8/2005 6:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/8/2005 6:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/8/2005 7:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/8/2005 7:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/8/2005 8:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/8/2005 10:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/8/2005 11:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? [T2005020400A5] - 2/4/2005 10:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] typing with XML Schema [T2005020400AD] - 2/4/2005 10:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 10:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/4/2005 11:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/5/2005 1:45:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/5/2005 1:50:00 AM
How simple is simple enough? - was Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/5/2005 3:59:00 AM
OASIS TC Call for Participation: OASIS SOA-RM TC - 2/5/2005 5:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] How simple is simple enough? - was Re: [xml-dev] xml2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/5/2005 12:26:00 PM
The Myth of Explicit Relationships [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] - 2/5/2005 8:12:00 PM
swamp cleanup day for xml 1.0 ... - 2/6/2005 1:23:00 PM
Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/6/2005 3:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The Myth of Explicit Relationships [Was: 3 XML Design Principles] - 2/6/2005 5:31:00 PM
Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/6/2005 5:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How simple is simple enough? - was Re: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/6/2005 5:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/6/2005 6:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/6/2005 9:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/6/2005 9:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all? - 2/7/2005 12:01:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/7/2005 1:56:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/7/2005 4:10:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/7/2005 5:57:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits"myth come from? - 2/7/2005 9:46:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/7/2005 10:55:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/7/2005 11:37:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/7/2005 1:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/7/2005 1:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/7/2005 1:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/7/2005 2:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/7/2005 2:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/7/2005 2:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/7/2005 3:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/7/2005 3:42:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/7/2005 3:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/7/2005 4:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/7/2005 4:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/7/2005 5:49:00 PM
RE: spam - 2/7/2005 7:47:00 PM
Unqualified Element without using xs:any - 2/7/2005 8:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/7/2005 9:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/7/2005 10:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/7/2005 10:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/7/2005 10:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/7/2005 10:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/7/2005 11:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Unqualified Element without using xs:any - 2/8/2005 12:58:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/8/2005 1:02:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/8/2005 1:23:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/8/2005 2:46:00 AM
Bounce messages from AdventureMail.com - 2/8/2005 3:00:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/8/2005 3:18:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Bounce messages from AdventureMail.com - 2/8/2005 3:26:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/8/2005 5:42:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/8/2005 5:42:00 AM
This week's XML Puzzler - 2/8/2005 5:54:00 AM
XSLT stylistics query - 2/8/2005 6:46:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/8/2005 9:50:00 AM
The XML 300 baud challenge - Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/8/2005 10:17:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/8/2005 12:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/8/2005 1:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/8/2005 3:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/8/2005 3:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/8/2005 4:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/8/2005 4:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/8/2005 5:05:00 PM
Java open source Schema aware XPath 2.0 processor released - 2/8/2005 5:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/8/2005 5:22:00 PM
[ADMIN] broken archive - 2/8/2005 5:47:00 PM
Before fragmenting, fix the broken bits first - 2/8/2005 5:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/8/2005 6:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/8/2005 7:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/10/2005 6:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/10/2005 6:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/10/2005 7:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/13/2005 10:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/14/2005 9:24:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/14/2005 3:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/16/2005 7:03:00 AM
Is the Web Stochastic? (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from?) - 2/8/2005 9:21:00 PM
Is this constraint expressible in XML Schema? - 2/8/2005 10:13:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Is this constraint expressible in XML Schema? - 2/9/2005 12:41:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/9/2005 12:17:00 PM
baffling encoding problem - 2/9/2005 12:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/9/2005 2:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/9/2005 7:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/9/2005 8:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/9/2005 9:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/9/2005 10:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/9/2005 10:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/9/2005 10:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/9/2005 10:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/9/2005 11:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/9/2005 11:34:00 PM
Combining DTD and Schema declarations in the same XML - 2/9/2005 2:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/9/2005 7:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/9/2005 8:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/9/2005 8:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] baffling encoding problem - 2/9/2005 9:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/9/2005 9:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/9/2005 10:18:00 PM
external entities - 2/10/2005 12:00:00 AM
extrernal entities - part 2 - 2/10/2005 2:25:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Is this constraint expressible in XML Schema? - 2/10/2005 4:19:00 PM
Schemas As Anti-bodies and Dynamical Systems - 2/10/2005 4:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Schemas As Anti-bodies and Dynamical Systems - 2/10/2005 6:23:00 PM
XML turns 7 - 2/10/2005 7:17:00 PM
XML jargon: declaration vs. definition - 2/10/2005 8:43:00 PM
[xml-dev] XML jargon: declaration vs. definition - 2/10/2005 9:35:00 PM
does expat support xsd? - 2/11/2005 3:24:00 AM
Assigning meaning to an element if attributes are present - 2/11/2005 7:10:00 AM
@href or @src? - 2/11/2005 9:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] @href or @src? - 2/12/2005 12:29:00 AM
use of xslt.rnc or xslt.xsd? - 2/12/2005 5:55:00 PM
[ANN] nux-1.0 final release - 2/12/2005 9:57:00 PM
what is the difference between "xs" and "xsd" for XML schema? - 2/12/2005 10:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] what is the difference between "xs" and "xsd" for XML schema? - 2/13/2005 4:39:00 PM
[ANN] RSSDigest - 2/13/2005 8:08:00 PM
Public Review of OASIS ebXML RIM and RS v3.0 specifications - 2/14/2005 12:41:00 AM
URLs of DTDs question - 2/14/2005 3:59:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] URLs of DTDs question - 2/14/2005 4:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Schemas As Anti-bodies and Dynamical Systems - 2/14/2005 8:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Schemas As Anti-bodies and Dynamical Systems - 2/14/2005 9:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Public Review of OASIS ebXML RIM and RS v3.0 specifications - 2/14/2005 10:14:00 PM
Master Foo explains XML to aliens - 2/15/2005 10:22:00 AM
Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing" - 2/15/2005 10:54:00 AM
Dynamically generating Java 'wrapper' class for XML - 2/16/2005 12:58:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/16/2005 7:03:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from? - 2/16/2005 8:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from? - 2/16/2005 9:06:00 AM
choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question - 2/16/2005 5:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question - 2/16/2005 5:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question - 2/16/2005 5:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question - 2/16/2005 6:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question - 2/16/2005 7:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question - 2/18/2005 10:36:00 AM
Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/18/2005 11:32:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/18/2005 10:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/18/2005 11:16:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/19/2005 4:06:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/19/2005 9:04:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/19/2005 9:39:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/19/2005 9:50:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/19/2005 10:23:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/19/2005 11:17:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/19/2005 11:42:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/19/2005 12:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/19/2005 2:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/21/2005 9:01:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/21/2005 1:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/19/2005 11:34:00 PM
Transmitting XML between different applications - 2/18/2005 11:32:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question - 2/19/2005 5:00:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question - 2/19/2005 5:52:00 PM
Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? - 2/16/2005 7:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? - 2/16/2005 9:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? - 2/16/2005 10:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? - 2/16/2005 10:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? - 2/16/2005 10:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? - 2/16/2005 10:27:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? - 2/16/2005 10:27:00 PM
The Stealth Specs: XQuery / XSLT publish 10 Working Drafts - 2/16/2005 10:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? - 2/16/2005 10:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? - 2/16/2005 10:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Why associate an attribute with a namespace ? - 2/16/2005 11:02:00 PM
sequence with elements with the same name is not allowed? - 2/16/2005 11:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing" - 2/16/2005 11:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing" - 2/17/2005 9:09:00 AM
What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3"Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/17/2005 11:58:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/18/2005 8:48:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] sequence with elements with the same name is not allowed? - 2/16/2005 11:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/17/2005 1:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/17/2005 3:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/17/2005 8:12:00 PM
New Technologies will change the business of publishing -- learn how -- March 9 in New York - 2/17/2005 11:14:00 PM
[ANN] XML Standards Library 2.1 : Updated 2005-02-17 - 2/18/2005 1:42:00 AM
Substitution Groups - 2/18/2005 10:01:00 AM
RE: Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/18/2005 9:19:00 PM
RE: Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/18/2005 10:08:00 PM
RE: Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/18/2005 10:58:00 PM
RE: Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/18/2005 10:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/18/2005 10:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/19/2005 7:39:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/19/2005 11:12:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/19/2005 11:24:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/19/2005 4:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/19/2005 4:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/19/2005 4:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/19/2005 5:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/19/2005 7:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/21/2005 9:01:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/21/2005 4:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/21/2005 4:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/21/2005 4:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/22/2005 10:06:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/22/2005 9:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/22/2005 9:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/23/2005 1:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/23/2005 4:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/23/2005 8:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/23/2005 8:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/23/2005 9:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/23/2005 9:15:00 PM
[ANN] XML BeLux XML Schema Series - 2/20/2005 2:14:00 PM
DTD element type "ANY" vs. XML Schema element type "anyType" - 2/20/2005 4:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] DTD element type "ANY" vs. XML Schema element type "anyType" - 2/20/2005 5:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] DTD element type "ANY" vs. XML Schema element type "anyType" - 2/20/2005 6:02:00 PM
A Business Analysts View: 3 XML Design Principles - 2/20/2005 7:10:00 PM
RE: Re: [xml-dev] What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: [xml-dev] Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing") - 2/21/2005 10:12:00 PM
Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (by Kohsuke Kawaguchi) - 2/22/2005 6:37:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (byKohsuke Kawaguchi) - 2/23/2005 10:12:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (by KohsukeKawaguchi) - 2/23/2005 12:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (byKohsuke - 2/23/2005 12:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (by Kohsuke - 2/23/2005 12:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (byKohsuke - 2/23/2005 1:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (by Kohsuke Kawaguchi) - 2/23/2005 2:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (by - 2/23/2005 2:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Why you should avoid Notation Declarations (by Kohsuke - 2/23/2005 6:51:00 PM
schema keyref to other schema. - 2/22/2005 10:46:00 AM
dynamic elements - 2/22/2005 1:34:00 PM
Jobs - 2/22/2005 3:25:00 PM
X3D Midi Sensor Node - 2/22/2005 6:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] X3D Midi Sensor Node - 2/22/2005 7:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. - 2/23/2005 9:40:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. - 2/23/2005 9:47:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. - 2/23/2005 10:17:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. - 2/23/2005 3:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. - 2/23/2005 4:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. - 2/23/2005 6:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. - 2/23/2005 7:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. - 2/24/2005 5:42:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. - 2/24/2005 2:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. - 2/24/2005 3:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. - 2/24/2005 4:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. - 2/24/2005 4:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] schema keyref to other schema. - 2/24/2005 5:42:00 PM
XML nd images - 2/23/2005 10:37:00 AM
[XUS] An XML URN Scheme - 2/23/2005 3:59:00 PM
Open source XML Schema Editor (graphical) in Java - 2/23/2005 5:49:00 PM
question about xercesc - 2/24/2005 7:11:00 PM
You are made active - 2/24/2005 9:12:00 PM
XML Binary Characterization publishes three new drafts - 2/25/2005 11:21:00 AM
[XUS] URN applied to Document Management Systems - 2/25/2005 1:03:00 PM
RSS/RSS-Data for General Data Exchange - 2/25/2005 5:04:00 PM
[ANN] XTech 2005 schedule posted - 2/26/2005 1:14:00 PM
[ANN] xframe - xsddoc 0.7-beta released - 2/26/2005 5:57:00 PM
=?US-ASCII?B?W0FOTl0gTWFya3VwV2FyZSAtIFNpbGtQYWdlIENvcmUgMC4zLjAgcmVsZWFzZWQ=?= - 2/27/2005 10:27:00 AM
=?US-ASCII?B?UmU6ICBbZG9jYm9vay1hcHBzXSBbQU5OXSBNYXJrdXBXYXJlIC0gU2lsa1BhZ2UgQ29yZSAwLjMuMCByZWxlYXNlZA==?= - 2/27/2005 1:16:00 PM
=?US-ASCII?B?UmU6IFt4bWwtZGV2XSBbQU5OXSBNYXJrdXBXYXJlIC0gU2lsa1BhZ2UgQ29yZSAwLjMuMCByZWxlYXNlZA==?= - 2/27/2005 7:15:00 PM
Quiz: XML flexibility - 2/27/2005 8:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Quiz: XML flexibility - 2/27/2005 8:32:00 PM
Document order calculation - 2/27/2005 8:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Quiz: XML flexibility - 2/27/2005 10:06:00 PM
WSDL too hard? - 2/28/2005 4:03:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Quiz: XML flexibility - 2/28/2005 10:24:00 AM


transparent
Print
Mail
Like It
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent