Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives


Re: [xml-dev] WS-Addressing to W3C: Is the Tide Turning?

From: Mark Baker <distobj@---.--->
To: Chiusano Joseph <chiusano_joseph@---.--->
Date: 8/12/2004 12:10:00 PM
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 08:51:29AM -0400, Chiusano Joseph wrote:
> For those interested in the Web Services specifications/standards
> landscape:
> 
> It was just announced that the WS-Addressing specification has been
> submitted to W3C[1].
> 
> Also, somewhat surprisingly given the "vendor dynamics" on such
> specifications: The authors include not only Microsoft, IBM, BEA, and
> SAP, but...Sun Microsystems. 

It's certainly good to see everybody working together, but it's
unfortunate that it's on yet another WS-* spec with very few redeeming
qualities.  Ok, maybe parts of sections 3 and 4 have some value, but its
raison d'etre, section 2, is IMO entirely unnecessary (and worse,
actively harmful).  URIs are perfectly adequate as message endpoint
references; nothing more is needed.

Mark.


transparent
Print
Mail
Like It
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent