Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives


Re: [OT] Difference between an extensible versus an evolvable informationsystem?

From: Victor <engmark-usenet@------.----.-->
To: xml-dev@-----.---.---
Date: 6/2/2004 1:15:00 PM
Roger L. Costello wrote:
> If adding new keywords and adding new categories are merely examples of 
> extension, then can you give an example of evolution?   /Roger

The first thing which strikes me in this case, is that extension (to me) 
means increasing the data available for execution of functions, or 
adding "trivial" functions, while evolution is something more 
fundamental, changing the overall behavior or appearance of the system 
in question. Thinking thus, adding a site to Google would be considered 
an extension, while changing the searching algorithm would be evolution.

You could also consider extensions to be everything which adds something 
new to a system, while evolution _changes_ the system.

Just my two (cheap) cents.

-- 
Victor


transparent
Print
Mail
Like It
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent